The choice between pneumatic and electrically powered sanding tools represents a critical decision for professionals and hobbyists alike. These tools, designed for surface abrasion and smoothing, operate on fundamentally different principles. One leverages compressed air to drive its abrasive action, while the other relies on an electric motor. Each presents distinct advantages and disadvantages depending on the application.
The significance of this decision stems from the implications for performance, efficiency, and safety. Historically, pneumatic options were favored in industrial settings due to their power and durability, while electric alternatives gained traction for their convenience and accessibility. This evolution reflects a broader trend toward task-specific tool selection optimizing outcomes and minimizing operational constraints. Considerations include power source availability, project scale, and desired finish.
This exploration will delve into the key characteristics differentiating these tools, examining their respective strengths and weaknesses regarding power output, control, maintenance, and cost. The analysis will consider various sanding applications, providing insights to guide the optimal selection for diverse project requirements and working environments.
1. Power Source
The operational heartbeat of any sanding tool lies in its power source. This fundamental aspect dictates not only the tool’s functionality but also its portability, operational constraints, and long-term suitability for specific applications. The choice between compressed air and electricity as the driving force behind these tools reveals a dichotomy with profound implications.
-
Compressed Air Dependency
Pneumatic sanders are inextricably linked to an external air compressor. This reliance establishes a tethered relationship; the tool’s power is entirely contingent on the compressor’s capacity and operational status. Imagine a bustling autobody shop, where the rhythmic hum of the compressor provides constant sustenance to a fleet of air-powered tools. The advantage lies in consistent power delivery, even under prolonged use, preventing the motor burnout common in electric variants. However, the compressor introduces limitations. Its size dictates portability, and its noise level can be a significant drawback. The efficiency of air compression also factors in; leaks in the system translate directly into reduced power and increased operational costs.
-
Electrical Grid Reliance
Electric sanders, in contrast, draw their energy from the electrical grid or, in some cases, portable batteries. This offers immediate accessibility in environments with readily available power outlets. Consider a craftsman working on-site, where plugging into a standard outlet provides instant power without the need for bulky compressors or air hoses. The trade-off lies in potential voltage fluctuations, which can impact performance. Moreover, extended use can lead to overheating and decreased efficiency, particularly in less robust models. Battery-powered versions offer cordless freedom but necessitate regular charging and potentially reduced power output compared to corded alternatives.
-
Initial Investment and Infrastructure
The power source dictates the initial investment beyond the sander itself. Pneumatic systems demand the acquisition of an air compressor, hoses, and potentially air line regulators. This represents a significant upfront cost, particularly for high-capacity compressors capable of supporting multiple tools. Electric systems, conversely, require only access to a power outlet or the purchase of batteries and chargers. While the initial outlay may be lower, the long-term cost of electricity or replacement batteries should be considered.
-
Safety Considerations
Each power source presents unique safety concerns. Pneumatic systems involve the risk of hose failures and projectiles from disconnected air lines. The high-pressure air itself can be hazardous if mishandled. Electric systems, on the other hand, pose the threat of electrical shock and the potential for cord damage. Proper grounding, insulation, and adherence to safety protocols are paramount when working with either type of sander. Additionally, the potential for sparks from electric motors in environments with flammable materials must be carefully assessed.
The choice of power source transcends mere convenience; it defines the operational ecosystem of the sanding tool. The hum of the compressor versus the whir of an electric motor represents a fundamental choice, one that dictates portability, power consistency, initial investment, and safety protocols. These considerations must be carefully weighed against the specific demands of the sanding task and the working environment to ensure optimal performance and safety.
2. Weight
The heft of a sanding tool is not merely a number on a specification sheet; it is a tangible factor that directly influences operator fatigue, maneuverability, and the suitability of the tool for specific tasks. In the arena of pneumatic versus electric sanders, weight emerges as a critical differentiator, shaping the user experience and determining the tool’s practicality in various scenarios.
-
Pneumatic Sander: The Weight of Air and Metal
Consider the image of a seasoned metalworker, laboring over a vintage automobile restoration. In their hands, an air-powered sander whirs, aggressively stripping away layers of rust and paint. These tools, often constructed with robust metal housings to withstand the rigors of industrial use and the constant pulsations of compressed air, tend to be heavier than their electric counterparts. The weight stems not only from the materials but also from the internal mechanisms designed for high-torque applications. This added weight can be advantageous when needing to apply consistent pressure for aggressive material removal. However, prolonged use, especially on vertical or overhead surfaces, can quickly lead to operator fatigue, diminishing precision and increasing the risk of errors.
-
Electric Sander: The Lightness of Electrification
Contrast this with a woodworker meticulously crafting intricate inlays on a delicate piece of furniture. An electric sander, lighter and more ergonomically designed, glides across the surface, refining edges and smoothing imperfections. Electric sanders, benefiting from advancements in materials science and compact motor designs, often achieve a lower weight profile. This lightness enhances maneuverability, allowing for greater control and finesse, especially in tight spaces or when working on complex shapes. The reduced weight also translates to less operator fatigue, enabling longer periods of focused work. However, this emphasis on lightness can sometimes come at the expense of durability; some lighter electric models may not withstand the same level of abuse as their heavier, air-powered brethren.
-
Weight Distribution and Ergonomics
The impact of weight extends beyond the simple number; weight distribution plays a crucial role in ergonomics and usability. A poorly balanced sander, regardless of its overall weight, can be cumbersome and difficult to control. Pneumatic sanders, with their air hose connections, can sometimes suffer from unbalanced weight distribution, pulling the tool in one direction. Electric sanders, particularly cordless models, must carefully balance the weight of the motor and battery pack to ensure comfortable and intuitive operation. Ergonomic design, including grip shape and handle placement, can further mitigate the effects of weight, improving operator comfort and reducing the risk of strain injuries.
-
The Task-Specific Weight Trade-off
The optimal weight for a sanding tool is ultimately task-dependent. For heavy-duty material removal on large, flat surfaces, the added weight of a pneumatic sander can provide stability and consistent pressure. However, for delicate finishing work, intricate detail sanding, or prolonged use in awkward positions, the lighter weight and enhanced maneuverability of an electric sander are often preferred. The choice represents a trade-off between power and control, endurance and precision, demanding a careful evaluation of the specific demands of the sanding project.
Thus, weight, often overlooked in the initial assessment of sanding tools, wields considerable influence over the user experience and the ultimate quality of the finished product. The narrative of pneumatic versus electric sanders is, in part, a story of competing philosophies: one prioritizing rugged durability and raw power, often at the expense of weight, and the other emphasizing agility and ease of use, achieved through innovative design and lightweight materials. The discerning user must carefully weigh these factors to select the tool that best aligns with their specific needs and operational constraints.
3. Control
Imagine a master woodworker, painstakingly shaping a violin’s delicate curves. In their hands, the tool must become an extension of their will, responding instantly and precisely to subtle shifts in pressure and angle. This pursuit of mastery hinges on control, a parameter that sharply distinguishes pneumatic and electric sanding tools. The ability to dictate the tool’s behaviorits speed, its aggressiveness, its responsivenessdirectly impacts the quality of the final product and the efficiency of the work process.
Electric sanders frequently offer variable speed settings, a feature enabling the operator to tailor the tool’s aggressiveness to the material and the desired finish. A low speed might be selected for delicate veneer work, preventing tear-out and allowing for gradual refinement. Conversely, a high speed would be engaged for rapid material removal on rough surfaces. Pneumatic sanders, while prized for their raw power, often lack this level of granular control. Their speed is typically governed by the air pressure delivered from the compressor, which can be less responsive and less precisely adjustable than the electronic controls found in electric models. This difference can translate into a steeper learning curve for pneumatic tools, demanding greater skill and experience to achieve consistent results. In the hands of a novice, the unbridled power of an air sander can quickly lead to mistakes, damaging the workpiece and wasting valuable material. The absence of variable speed control in many pneumatic sanders also makes them less suitable for heat-sensitive materials, where high speeds can cause burning or warping.
Ultimately, the question of control boils down to the specific demands of the task. For applications requiring brute force and rapid material removal, the inherent power of a pneumatic sander may outweigh the need for fine-grained adjustments. However, for projects demanding precision, delicacy, and the ability to adapt to varying material characteristics, the superior control offered by electric sanders provides a significant advantage. The choice, therefore, is not simply a matter of power source, but a careful consideration of the level of command required to achieve the desired outcome.
4. Maintenance
Maintenance, an unsung hero in the realm of tools, dictates longevity and consistent performance, particularly when comparing pneumatic and electric sanders. The differing mechanisms of these tools necessitate distinct approaches to upkeep, directly impacting their lifespan and operational reliability. A forgotten oil reservoir in a pneumatic system or a neglected carbon brush in an electric motor can precipitate a cascade of failures, rendering a valuable tool unusable.
Consider the scenario of a bustling woodworking shop. Amidst the sawdust and the scent of freshly cut lumber, sits a row of sanders, some powered by air, others by electricity. The shop owner, a seasoned craftsman, understands that neglecting these tools is akin to neglecting the very foundation of his business. The air sanders, with their intricate network of internal components, require regular lubrication to prevent premature wear and ensure smooth operation. Moisture in the compressed air lines, an inevitable consequence of atmospheric conditions, can corrode internal parts if left unchecked. Electric sanders, on the other hand, demand attention to their electrical components. Carbon brushes, responsible for conducting electricity to the motor, gradually wear down over time and must be replaced to maintain optimal performance. Dust accumulation, a constant companion in any woodworking environment, can clog the motor’s cooling vents, leading to overheating and eventual failure. Each type of tool presents its own set of vulnerabilities, demanding a proactive maintenance strategy.
The practical implications of this understanding are profound. A well-maintained tool not only lasts longer but also performs more consistently, delivering a higher quality finish and reducing the risk of costly rework. Regular maintenance minimizes downtime, ensuring that projects are completed on time and within budget. Moreover, a commitment to tool upkeep fosters a culture of responsibility and professionalism, enhancing the reputation of the craftsman and the business. Neglecting these essential tasks, conversely, can lead to a spiral of escalating costs, frustration, and ultimately, a decline in the quality of workmanship. The diligent application of maintenance principles transforms these tools from mere implements into reliable partners, contributing to the success and sustainability of any sanding endeavor.
5. Dust Collection
In the realm of woodworking, metal fabrication, and automotive repair, the sanding process invariably produces a cloud of particulate matter. This seemingly innocuous byproduct, however, poses significant risks to both the operator’s health and the surrounding environment. The efficacy of dust collection systems, therefore, becomes a critical consideration when evaluating air sanders versus electric sanders. The design and implementation of these systems directly influence the quality of the work environment and the long-term well-being of the individuals employing these tools.
Imagine a small cabinet shop, filled with the rhythmic hum of machinery. A craftsman meticulously sands a cabinet door. Without an adequate dust collection system, fine particles of wood dust would become airborne, settling on every surface and infiltrating the air. Over time, this constant exposure can lead to respiratory problems, skin irritation, and even more severe health complications. The type of sander employed air or electric dramatically affects the efficiency of dust extraction. Many electric sanders come equipped with integrated dust collection ports, designed to connect directly to vacuum systems. These systems effectively capture a significant portion of the dust at its source, minimizing airborne particulate matter. Air sanders, particularly older models, often lack such integrated features. Adapting them for dust collection may require aftermarket modifications or the use of cumbersome external collectors, resulting in a less efficient and more cumbersome setup. The choice between these tools, then, transcends mere power and performance; it encompasses a commitment to operator safety and environmental responsibility.
The implications extend beyond the immediate health concerns. Accumulated dust can also interfere with the finishing process, leading to imperfections and requiring additional sanding. In industrial settings, poor dust control can even pose a fire hazard, particularly when working with flammable materials. The integration of effective dust collection systems into sanding operations represents a sound investment, reducing health risks, improving the quality of the finished product, and promoting a safer and more productive work environment. The debate between air and electric sanders must therefore consider the practical limitations and advantages of each tool in the context of dust management.
6. Noise Level
The persistent din of sanding, a ubiquitous soundtrack in workshops and construction sites, extends beyond mere annoyance. It represents a significant factor affecting operator comfort, workplace safety, and even regulatory compliance. The characteristic sonic profiles of air sanders versus electric sanders contribute substantially to this acoustic landscape, shaping the work environment in subtle yet profound ways.
-
Pneumatic Roar: The Symphony of Compressed Air
Picture a bustling auto body repair shop. The hiss of compressed air is omnipresent, punctuated by the high-pitched whine of a pneumatic sander attacking rusted metal. Air sanders, by their very nature, generate substantial noise. The source lies in the expulsion of compressed air, a process that creates a characteristic roaring sound. The intensity of this sound can vary depending on the tool’s design and the air pressure employed, but it consistently registers at levels that demand hearing protection. Extended exposure to this pneumatic roar can lead to gradual hearing loss, tinnitus, and other auditory ailments. The shop owner, aware of these dangers, mandates the use of earplugs, a constant reminder of the inherent acoustic hazards of the trade. Compliance, however, is not always universal, and the long-term consequences can be devastating.
-
Electric Hum: The Whir of Rotating Motors
Contrast this with a woodworking studio, where the dominant sound is the lower-pitched hum of an electric sander smoothing a cabinet door. Electric sanders, while not entirely silent, typically generate a less intense and less high-frequency noise profile than their pneumatic counterparts. The primary source of this noise is the electric motor, specifically the whir of rotating components and the vibration of the tool’s housing. While the overall sound level may be lower, the constant drone can still be fatiguing over extended periods. Moreover, specific electric sander models, particularly those with worn bearings or poorly designed housings, can produce unpleasant vibrations that contribute to operator discomfort. The woodworker, sensitive to these subtle nuances, selects tools based not only on performance but also on their acoustic properties, seeking a balance between efficiency and comfort.
-
Acoustic Enclosures and Noise Mitigation Strategies
The detrimental effects of sanding noise are not insurmountable. Various mitigation strategies exist, ranging from simple hearing protection to more elaborate acoustic enclosures. The auto body shop invests in noise-dampening panels to line the walls, reducing the reverberation of the pneumatic roar. The woodworking studio incorporates sound-absorbing materials into the ceiling, minimizing the propagation of the electric hum. These efforts, while often costly, demonstrate a commitment to creating a healthier and more productive work environment. Furthermore, advancements in tool design are gradually reducing noise levels, with manufacturers incorporating quieter motors and improved air exhaust systems. The pursuit of acoustic comfort is an ongoing process, driven by a growing awareness of the long-term consequences of noise pollution.
-
Regulatory Compliance and Occupational Safety
In many jurisdictions, workplace noise levels are regulated to protect worker health. Exceeding permissible exposure limits can result in fines and legal liabilities. Both the auto body shop and the woodworking studio must comply with these regulations, conducting regular noise assessments and implementing appropriate control measures. Failure to do so can expose workers to unnecessary risks and jeopardize the business’s operational license. The selection of sanding tools, therefore, becomes not only a matter of personal preference but also a matter of legal compliance. The shop owner, acutely aware of these constraints, carefully evaluates the noise levels of each tool before making a purchase, prioritizing models that meet or exceed regulatory standards.
The acoustic landscape of sanding is a complex interplay of tool design, environmental factors, and operator practices. The contrasting sound profiles of air sanders and electric sanders underscore the importance of considering noise level as a critical factor in tool selection. The persistent din of sanding serves as a constant reminder of the need for proactive noise mitigation strategies and a commitment to creating a healthier and more comfortable work environment.
7. Portability
Portability, often the deciding factor in tool selection, casts a significant shadow upon the choice between pneumatic and electric sanding tools. The essence of portability lies not merely in the object’s weight, but in the ease with which it can be transported and operated across diverse locations, often with limited infrastructure. Consider a construction site, where the craftsman’s workspace shifts from one corner of the building to another. The very nature of their labor demands tools that can adapt to this transient environment, unencumbered by the constraints of stationary power sources or intricate setups.
The implications of limited portability become starkly evident when considering a remote restoration project. Imagine a team tasked with revitalizing a historic barn, far removed from reliable power grids. An air sander, dependent on a bulky compressor, becomes a logistical hurdle, demanding the transportation of heavy equipment and the management of cumbersome air hoses. In contrast, a cordless electric sander, powered by rechargeable batteries, offers unparalleled freedom, enabling the team to move about the barn with ease, unconstrained by cables or air lines. Yet, even the cordless solution presents its own challenges. Battery life becomes a critical factor, demanding careful planning and the availability of charging facilities. The project’s success hinges not only on the tool’s performance but also on its adaptability to the unique demands of the remote environment. This highlights the practical significance of understanding the subtle nuances of portability, extending beyond mere physical weight to encompass logistical considerations and operational constraints. The choice hinges on the balance between power, endurance, and the freedom to operate in the most challenging of settings.
The interplay between portability and sanding tools reflects a broader trend towards adaptable solutions. The pneumatic option, bound by the compressor, becomes a semi-permanent fixture. The electric, especially cordless, offers freedom, with range limitations. As technology evolves, battery life improves, and compact air compressors emerge, the balance shifts. The ultimate choice remains a careful assessment of project requirements, recognizing the crucial role portability plays in efficiency and overall project success. Challenges include battery life limitations for cordless electric options, and the cost and space associated with air compressors for pneumatic sanders. Nevertheless, the understanding of portability ensures the right tool is selected to enable project completion.
Frequently Asked Questions
Navigating the world of sanding tools can often feel like traversing a complex labyrinth. This section addresses frequently encountered questions regarding air and electric sanders, aiming to provide clarity and dispel common misconceptions. Each query is approached with a serious tone, reflecting the importance of informed decision-making in professional and DIY settings.
Question 1: Is an air sander truly more powerful than its electric counterpart?
The assertion that air sanders universally possess greater power necessitates careful examination. Power output, measured in horsepower or wattage, varies significantly across both air and electric models. While pneumatic tools often excel in continuous high-demand applications, electric sanders have narrowed the gap with technological advancements. The key determinant lies not in the power source alone, but in the specific tool’s design and intended use. A high-end electric sander may outperform a low-capacity air sander, and vice versa. Consider the task at hand, and examine the power ratings of individual models, rather than relying on generalizations.
Question 2: What is the real cost difference between owning an air sander and an electric sander?
The financial implications extend beyond the initial purchase price. An air sander necessitates the additional investment in an air compressor, hoses, and fittings. Furthermore, the operational cost includes the energy consumption of the compressor, which can be substantial over prolonged use. Electric sanders, while often requiring a lower initial investment, may incur higher long-term maintenance costs, particularly if brushes need frequent replacement or the motor experiences premature failure. A comprehensive cost analysis must factor in both the upfront expenses and the recurring operational costs to accurately assess the true financial burden of each tool.
Question 3: How significant is the difference in maintenance requirements between air and electric sanders?
Maintenance protocols differ considerably between the two tool types. Air sanders demand meticulous attention to air line moisture, lubrication, and the condition of the compressor. Neglecting these aspects can lead to corrosion, reduced performance, and costly repairs. Electric sanders, conversely, require monitoring of carbon brushes, cord integrity, and motor ventilation. Overlooking these elements can result in overheating, electrical hazards, and motor burnout. While neither tool is inherently maintenance-free, the nature of the required upkeep differs significantly, potentially favoring one type over the other based on individual skill sets and available resources.
Question 4: Are electric sanders safer to use than air sanders, or vice versa?
Safety concerns manifest differently for air and electric sanders. Electric sanders pose the risk of electrical shock, particularly in damp environments or with damaged cords. Air sanders present hazards related to compressed air, including hose failures and the potential for projectiles. The choice hinges on individual safety practices and adherence to recommended protocols. Properly grounded electrical systems and well-maintained air lines are essential for mitigating risks associated with each tool type. Neither tool is inherently safer; both demand a responsible and informed approach to operation.
Question 5: Can the dust collection capabilities truly vary that much between air and electric sanders?
The disparity in dust collection effectiveness can be substantial. Many modern electric sanders incorporate integrated dust ports designed for direct connection to vacuum systems. This facilitates efficient dust extraction at the source, minimizing airborne particulate matter. Air sanders, particularly older models, often lack such integrated features, necessitating aftermarket modifications or external collectors. The efficiency of dust collection profoundly impacts the operator’s health and the cleanliness of the work environment. A meticulous evaluation of dust collection capabilities is crucial for those prioritizing safety and air quality.
Question 6: Does the noise level difference between air and electric sanders really matter?
The impact of noise exposure extends beyond mere annoyance. Prolonged exposure to high noise levels can lead to irreversible hearing damage, stress, and reduced productivity. Air sanders, characterized by the high-pitched whine of compressed air, often generate significantly higher noise levels than electric sanders. While hearing protection is essential regardless of the tool used, the reduced noise output of electric sanders can contribute to a more comfortable and less hazardous work environment. The significance of this difference should not be underestimated, particularly in settings where sanding is a frequent and prolonged activity.
In summation, the selection between air and electric sanders transcends simple preference; it requires a careful and considered evaluation of power, cost, maintenance, safety, dust collection, and noise level. This section aimed to illuminate these considerations, empowering individuals to make informed decisions based on their specific needs and circumstances.
Now, the article will transition into specific sanding techniques and recommendations for diverse materials and finishes.
Sanding Wisdom
The choice between pneumatic and electric sanders is not merely technical; it’s a narrative woven through years of experience. These tips, culled from countless hours in workshops, aim to illuminate the practical realities of choosing between the “air sander vs electric sander”.
Tip 1: Listen to the Whisper of the Wood: Seasoned cabinetmakers often speak of “listening” to the wood. When dealing with delicate veneers, an electric sander with variable speed offers the finesse required to avoid tear-out. The gentle hum of the motor allows for controlled material removal, preserving the wood’s integrity. Consider the tale of a luthier who, after years of struggling with an air sander’s aggressiveness, discovered the subtle control afforded by an electric model. The result was a richer tone, a testament to the tool’s responsiveness.
Tip 2: Embrace the Beast: In contrast, the roar of an air sander becomes a symphony of efficiency when tackling rust removal from an old chassis. The tool’s relentless power devours corrosion, revealing clean metal beneath. An anecdote tells of a vintage car restorer who swore by his air sander, claiming it halved the time spent on surface preparation. Here, speed trumps finesse; brute force becomes the key to reclaiming history.
Tip 3: Cord Management is Key: In sprawling construction sites, the tether of an electric cord can become a liability. The tale of a drywall finisher tripping over a power cord highlights a practical truth: portability often outweighs raw power. Cordless electric sanders offer the freedom to maneuver without constraint, enhancing both safety and efficiency.
Tip 4: Respect the Breath of the Tool: Pneumatic sanders demand clean, dry air. Ignoring this imperative can lead to premature wear and inconsistent performance. A seasoned mechanic once recounted how a clogged air line nearly ruined a meticulous paint job. Regular maintenance is not merely a suggestion; it’s a prerequisite for reliable operation. Moisture separators and inline oilers become essential components of the pneumatic ecosystem.
Tip 5: The Devil is in the Dust: Dust collection is not merely a health concern; it’s a quality imperative. Electric sanders, often equipped with integrated dust ports, offer a cleaner work environment and a superior finish. A furniture maker, after years of battling airborne particulate matter, invested in a high-efficiency electric sander with a vacuum attachment. The result was a noticeable improvement in air quality and a reduction in finishing imperfections.
Tip 6: Balance the Load: When working overhead or at awkward angles, weight becomes a critical factor. Lighter electric sanders reduce fatigue, enabling prolonged work sessions. The tale of a ceiling refinisher who switched to a lightweight model underscores a simple truth: comfort translates to precision.
Tip 7: Find the Sweet Spot in Speed: Variable speed controls are invaluable when working with heat-sensitive materials. Electric sanders with adjustable speed settings allow for gentle abrasion, preventing burning or warping. A guitar maker, known for his meticulous craftsmanship, relies on this feature to achieve a flawless finish on delicate spruce tops.
These stories underscore a central theme: tool selection is not about abstract specifications but about real-world applications. Each sanding task presents its own unique challenges, demanding a thoughtful assessment of power, portability, control, and maintenance.
The narrative continues as we explore sanding techniques for specific materials, aiming to equip you with the knowledge to navigate the sanding landscape with confidence and skill.
The Sanding Chronicle
The preceding pages have traced a path through the landscape of sanding tools, contrasting pneumatic and electric options. Power source, portability, control, maintenance, and dust management emerge as critical factors, shaping the operational narrative. Anecdotes from workshops underscore the practical implications, demonstrating how seasoned professionals navigate the nuances of material, technique, and environment. The chronicles of luthiers, restorers, and carpenters resonate, revealing the subtle art of tool selection as a cornerstone of craftsmanship. These professionals know the “air sander vs electric sander” is not a superficial debate.
The choice remains a personal odyssey, a quest for the tool best suited to the hand, the task, and the setting. May this exploration serve as a compass, guiding the reader towards informed decisions and the pursuit of excellence in their sanding endeavors. The next chapter in the sanding chronicle awaits, written in the sweat, skill, and dedication of those who shape the world, one grain at a time.
