The phrase identifies a specific film title, the year of its release, its complete version, and a prominent online digital library. It represents a user’s search intent to locate and view the entire cinematic work, released in 2005, on a platform known for archiving diverse digital content. This search query suggests an interest in accessing and potentially viewing the film through this particular online resource.
This search term highlights the enduring nature of film preservation and accessibility facilitated by digital archives. The Internet Archive, in particular, functions as a repository for a wide range of media, enabling access to materials that might otherwise be difficult to obtain. This capability is significant for film enthusiasts, researchers, and those interested in cultural preservation, as it offers a means to explore and study cinematic works from various periods.
The availability of film content through online archives raises questions regarding copyright, distribution rights, and the ethical considerations of accessing such material. The remainder of this discussion will explore the legal and practical aspects of accessing films online, including an examination of copyright law and the responsibilities of both content providers and consumers.
1. Film Identification
The nucleus of “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” lies in its initial component: the identification of a specific cinematic work. Without clear, unambiguous recognition of the film, the entire query collapses. It is the foundational element upon which all subsequent actionsthe search for, access to, and viewing of the filmdepend. This identification acts as a precise marker, differentiating the film from countless others in the vast cinematic landscape. The title, “Lie with Me,” coupled with its year of release, 2005, provides the necessary precision. It sets in motion a chain reaction: accurate identification allows search engines to retrieve the relevant results, and directs the user toward the desired content within the Internet Archive’s extensive collection.
Consider a scenario where the film’s title is slightly misremembered, or the year of release is inaccurate. Such inaccuracies, seemingly minor, can lead to a fruitless search, directing the user toward unrelated content or yielding no results at all. The film’s identification is thus not merely a label; it is the key to unlocking access within the digital library. For example, a search for “Lie with Me 2006” would likely return irrelevant results, highlighting the absolute importance of accurate film identification in the retrieval process. This principle holds true across all digital archives and streaming platforms; precision in identification is paramount.
In summary, film identification is not merely a preliminary step but the cornerstone upon which the entire process of locating and accessing a specific cinematic work through a digital archive rests. It underscores the necessity for accuracy and precision in search queries, ensuring that the user is directed to the intended content. The success of the query “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” is fundamentally dependent on the unambiguous and correct identification of the film, “Lie with Me,” released in 2005.
2. Year of Release
The inclusion of “2005” within “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” transcends a simple data point; it acts as a temporal anchor, grounding the cinematic work within a specific historical and cultural context. It is the year a story entered the world, shaped by and reflective of the era’s artistic sensibilities, societal anxieties, and technological limitations. To omit it would be akin to navigating the seas without a compass, adrift in the ocean of cinema.
-
Contextual Significance
The year of release immediately situates the film within a period. It hints at the prevalent cinematic styles, technological capabilities in filmmaking, and the social climate that might have influenced the narrative. For “Lie with Me” (2005), the year places it amidst a specific era of independent filmmaking, characterized by a particular aesthetic and approach to storytelling. For instance, distribution models were different in 2005, largely pre-dating widespread streaming adoption, making the film’s presence on a platform like the Internet Archive particularly noteworthy.
-
Version Differentiation
In some cases, multiple films might share a title. The year of release becomes crucial in distinguishing between different cinematic adaptations or remakes. Imagine searching for a film titled “The Bridge” the year clarifies whether one seeks the 1959 German anti-war film, a contemporary adaptation, or some other work entirely. The “2005” in “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” acts as a filter, narrowing down the search results and eliminating potential misinterpretations arising from similar titles across different eras.
-
Copyright and Availability
Copyright laws are directly tied to the year of creation and publication. Understanding the release date is essential for determining whether a film is still under copyright protection or has entered the public domain. This information is especially relevant when accessing films via platforms like the Internet Archive, which operates within the bounds of copyright law. Knowing the film’s age helps assess the legality and ethical considerations of its availability on such a platform. If the film still falls under copyright protection, its presence necessitates a license or other legal justification.
-
Archival Practices
For the Internet Archive itself, the year of release is metadata, a crucial component in cataloging and organizing its vast collection. It allows users to refine searches, browse films chronologically, and understand the historical scope of the archive’s holdings. The year acts as a label, enabling efficient retrieval and promoting historical awareness. It’s not simply a number but a marker of time, helping researchers and film enthusiasts navigate the archive’s resources with greater precision and insight.
The “2005” within “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” is not a mere addendum but an integral part of the query. It anchors the film in time, clarifies its context, and informs the legal and ethical considerations surrounding its access. It’s the year a story took flight, and understanding its significance is essential for navigating the digital archives of cinema.
3. Complete Version
The phrase “complete version,” when interwoven with “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive,” speaks to a yearning for unadulterated cinematic experience. It’s a silent demand, echoing across the digital expanse, for the film in its intended form. Consider the alternative: a truncated cut, a scene excised for time, a critical moment lost to censorship. Each omission diminishes the original vision, leaving the viewer with a fragmented, incomplete narrative. Thus, “complete version” becomes a sentinel, guarding against the depredations of editorial interference and ensuring the artist’s voice is heard in its totality. The searcher isn’t merely seeking “Lie with Me” (2005); they’re pursuing the film as it was conceived, as it premiered, a covenant with the filmmaker’s initial intent.
The pursuit of the “complete version” carries practical consequences. Abridged versions, particularly in international markets, can alter the storyline’s coherence or character development. Critical subplots might be excised, impacting the overall understanding and thematic resonance. Imagine a detective film where a vital clue is removed, rendering the denouement nonsensical, or a historical drama where context is lost, changing the narrative’s political or social weight. The completeness is thus not merely a matter of preference but one of interpretive integrity. Online, particularly within archives like the Internet Archive, provenance becomes paramount. The assurance of a full, unabridged version necessitates verifying the source, checking user reviews for reported cuts, or consulting film databases that track alternative edits and releases.
In summation, the insistence on a “complete version” embedded within “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” signals a deeper engagement with cinematic art. It acknowledges the filmmaker’s creative agency and seeks to preserve the viewing experience from unintended alterations. The onus is on the viewer to ensure authenticity, sifting through potential pitfalls to reach the fully realized film, honoring the artistic vision behind “Lie with Me” (2005).
4. Digital Repository
The quest initiated by “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” hinges on the existence of a digital repository. Without such a storehouse, the search becomes a futile endeavor, an echo in a vacuum. The digital repository, in this context, is more than mere storage; it is the library, the archive, the vault where digital artifacts, including films, find refuge and potential resurrection. The Internet Archive, as a prime example, functions as such a repository, accumulating and preserving vast quantities of digital data. The connection is causal: the search term anticipates that this specific film resides within the holdings of this or a similar digital library. The user’s query is predicated on the repository’s capacity to house and serve digital content, making it an indispensable link in the chain.
The importance of the “Digital Repository” manifests in accessibility. A film’s presence in a physical archive may be limited by geographical constraints, operating hours, and archival procedures. Conversely, a digital repository offers the potential for near-instantaneous access, transcending spatial barriers and democratizing information. The search “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” reflects this expectation of on-demand availability. However, the practical application of this understanding carries responsibilities. The presence of the film within a repository does not automatically grant unrestricted access. Copyright restrictions, licensing agreements, and the repository’s own terms of service govern the availability of the content. A user must navigate these complexities to determine the legality and ethical implications of accessing and viewing the film. Real-life examples abound: many films on the Internet Archive are available for streaming but not for download due to copyright limitations. The user’s comprehension of these nuances is crucial.
In summary, the digital repository is not merely a backdrop to the search “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive”; it is a central character in the drama of access. It dictates the parameters of possibility, shaping the user’s experience and obligating them to consider the legal and ethical dimensions. The challenge lies in balancing the democratization of information with the rights of content creators, a tension that underscores the ongoing evolution of digital archiving and access.
5. Accessibility Desired
Within the digital whisper of “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” lies a potent yearning: the desire for access. It is the invisible engine driving the search, the unspoken plea to bridge the distance between viewer and film. This desire is not passive; it’s an active force, shaping the searcher’s expectations and influencing their interpretation of the search results. It colors the entire endeavor with anticipation, tinged with the potential for both fulfillment and disappointment. Consider “Accessibility Desired” as the key that the searcher hopes will unlock the cinematic treasure trove.
-
Immediacy of Viewing
The digital age has fostered a culture of instant gratification. “Accessibility Desired” often translates to a craving for immediate viewing, the ability to stream the film without delay. The searcher anticipates a seamless transition from query to cinematic experience, a world away from the protracted waits associated with physical media or traditional broadcast schedules. If a link promises access but delivers buffering issues, excessive ads, or broken streams, the user experience is soured, highlighting the importance of smooth, uninterrupted access. In the landscape of countless online video options, the ability to immediately watch the film is vital.
-
Cost Considerations
Accessibility is not solely about convenience; it frequently encompasses financial implications. The “Accessibility Desired” might stem from a reluctance to pay for the film, whether through rental or purchase. The allure of the Internet Archive, or similar repositories, often rests on the assumption of free access. But this assumption clashes with copyright realities. “Accessibility Desired” may lead the searcher down paths of questionable legality, navigating grey areas of digital rights. The trade-off between convenience and ethics becomes a central tension in the quest. The ethics of freely watching a film when there are copyright considerations must always be contemplated.
-
Geographical Restrictions
Licensing agreements often impose geographical limitations on film distribution. A film readily available in one region might be inaccessible in another. “Accessibility Desired” is often challenged by these restrictions, forcing searchers to seek workarounds like VPNs or alternative sources. These measures, however, introduce further complexities, potentially violating terms of service or infringing on copyright laws. In many instances, people are searching for film, just to realize their region is restricted which hinders access. These restriction become a challenge to solve with legal restrictions.
-
Archival Preservation
Sometimes, “Accessibility Desired” represents a deeper concern: the desire to ensure the film’s preservation and continued availability. Older films, particularly those outside mainstream distribution channels, may face the threat of digital obsolescence. The Internet Archive, in this context, functions as a safeguard, rescuing films from obscurity and making them accessible to future generations. Here, the “Accessibility Desired” transcends personal gratification; it becomes a collective responsibility to protect and share cultural heritage. Archiving allows us to preserve film and digital data, preventing data obsolescence.
In conclusion, “Accessibility Desired,” as it intertwines with “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive,” represents a multifaceted quest. It embodies a spectrum of motivations, ranging from immediate gratification to ethical considerations and a commitment to cultural preservation. The journey is fraught with challenges, requiring searchers to navigate a complex landscape of copyright laws, geographical restrictions, and the inherent limitations of digital repositories. Yet, within this complexity lies a profound testament to the enduring power of cinema and the unwavering human desire to connect with stories, regardless of time or place.
6. Copyright Concerns
The digital echo of “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” summons not just a film, but also a phantom: Copyright Concerns. This spectre haunts every digital archive, every streaming platform, every shared file. It’s a legal and ethical minefield, where the desire for accessibility clashes head-on with the rights of creators and distributors. The search for the film intersects with the complex web of intellectual property, transforming a simple query into a potential legal quagmire.
-
Ownership and Licensing
The film “Lie with Me” (2005) is not ownerless. Production companies, distributors, and individual creators hold specific rights to the film, including the right to copy, distribute, and display it publicly. These rights are typically governed by licensing agreements, contracts that dictate who can do what with the film and under what conditions. When “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” yields a result on the Internet Archive, the question becomes: does the Archive possess the necessary licenses to legally host and stream the film? Often, the answer is unclear, mired in layers of permissions and legal ambiguities. A film appearing available does not guarantee lawful access.
-
Fair Use Exceptions
Copyright law acknowledges certain exceptions, commonly termed “fair use,” allowing limited use of copyrighted material without permission. These exceptions, such as criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research, are narrowly defined and subject to interpretation. Could accessing “Lie with Me” (2005) for scholarly research fall under fair use? Perhaps, but the boundaries are hazy. The extent of the use, the purpose, and the impact on the market value of the film all factor into the equation. Simply wanting to watch the film for personal entertainment almost certainly falls outside the scope of fair use. Each searcher must become a legal analyst, evaluating their own intent against the backdrop of copyright law.
-
Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)
The DMCA, a U.S. law, adds another layer of complexity. It aims to protect copyrighted material online, granting copyright holders the power to issue takedown notices to online platforms hosting infringing content. The Internet Archive, like any responsible digital repository, must comply with the DMCA, removing content when faced with a valid takedown request. Therefore, “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” might initially yield a positive result, only to have the film disappear later due to a DMCA notice. The accessibility becomes transient, contingent on the ever-shifting landscape of copyright enforcement. What’s available one day may vanish the next.
-
International Copyright Laws
Copyright law is not monolithic; it varies from country to country. A film that has entered the public domain in one nation might still be protected in another. Accessing “Lie with Me” (2005) from different geographical locations might entail different legal ramifications. A user in Canada might face different restrictions than a user in Germany. The international nature of the internet complicates matters, requiring a nuanced understanding of copyright regulations across borders. Copyright laws around the world often have complicated rules and enforcements making it tough to maneuver through.
The shadow of “Copyright Concerns” darkens the path of “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive.” It transforms a simple search into a complex dance with legal and ethical considerations. The availability of the film is not a guarantee of lawful access; it’s an invitation to navigate the intricate web of intellectual property rights. The searcher must become a cautious explorer, aware of the potential pitfalls and mindful of the rights of those who brought the film into existence. Only then can the cinematic journey be undertaken with a clear conscience.
7. Distribution Rights
The invocation of “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” initiates a silent reckoning with an unseen power: Distribution Rights. These rights, often relegated to fine print, are the arteries through which a film reaches its audience. They dictate who can disseminate “Lie with Me” (2005), where, and how. Without these rights properly secured, the film remains locked away, its narrative imprisoned despite the digital keys offered by search engines. The query itself becomes a poignant reminder of this unseen governance, the rules that determine whether the cinematic creation can be freely shared or restricted by contractual limitations. This search, seemingly straightforward, is a quest through a labyrinth of legal ownership and territorial agreements. The existence of the movie in digital format becomes insignificant if the distribution rights are not in place to authorize its sharing on platforms like the Internet Archive.
The absence of valid Distribution Rights casts a long shadow on the Internet Archive’s potential hosting of “Lie with Me” (2005). The Archive, as a responsible steward of digital content, operates under the constraints of copyright law. If the platform lacks explicit permission from the rights holders, the film’s presence constitutes infringement, inviting legal repercussions. Imagine a scenario: a user, delighted to find the film after years of searching, streams it with a sense of cinematic discovery. Unbeknownst to them, the Archive is operating without clearance, walking a tightrope between providing access and violating intellectual property laws. The rights issue might surface later in the form of a takedown notice, abruptly cutting off access and reminding users of the invisible framework governing digital content. Real-world examples abound; many films, documentaries, and even public domain works disappear from digital platforms due to renewed copyright claims or licensing disputes. The ephemeral nature of online access serves as a persistent reminder of the powerful undercurrent of distribution agreements.
The understanding of Distribution Rights transforms the user’s search from a simple retrieval exercise into a critical inquiry. It necessitates questioning the legitimacy of the source, investigating the platform’s policies, and recognizing the inherent limitations of unrestricted digital access. The quest to watch “Lie with Me” (2005) evolves into a responsibility, urging viewers to engage with the complex realities of copyright and contribute to a more informed consumption of digital content. The challenge remains: how to balance the accessibility afforded by digital archives with the protection of creative expression and the enforcement of intellectual property rights. The search itself, a seemingly harmless act, highlights the ongoing negotiation between access and control in the digital age, a dance where Distribution Rights sets the rhythm.
8. Archival Significance
The phrase “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” carries within it an implicit acknowledgment of time’s passage and the enduring importance of preserving cultural artifacts. The film, once a contemporary release, now exists within a historical context, shaped by evolving social norms, cinematic trends, and technological advancements. Its presence within a digital archive transforms it from mere entertainment into a document of its era, a snapshot of cultural values and artistic expression from 2005. This transformation underscores the core concept of archival significance: the recognition that certain materials possess lasting value, worthy of preservation for future generations. The search query, therefore, is not simply about finding a movie to watch; it’s an unconscious participation in the process of cultural preservation, a validation of the film’s enduring relevance.
The Internet Archive, as the named repository, plays a crucial role in this process. Its mission extends beyond mere storage; it actively curates and protects digital content, ensuring that these artifacts remain accessible despite the relentless march of technological obsolescence. Film, particularly in digital form, is susceptible to degradation, format incompatibility, and copyright restrictions that can render it unplayable. The Archive’s commitment to digital preservation mitigates these risks, allowing future viewers to experience “Lie with Me” (2005) in a manner as close as possible to its original form. Consider the numerous films that have been lost to time due to neglect or improper storage; the Internet Archive offers a counter-narrative, a commitment to safeguarding cultural heritage. It provides a space for people to see and explore films, even if some parts have digital defects. For example, several early 20th-century films survived only because copies were stored haphazardly, allowing them to be restored decades later. The Internet Archive actively seeks to prevent such losses.
The connection between “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” and archival significance hinges on this recognition of lasting value. The film, by virtue of its continued availability and discoverability, contributes to a broader understanding of cinematic history and cultural evolution. The search itself reinforces this significance, demonstrating that the film retains an audience and a purpose beyond its initial release. The challenges of digital preservation remain significant, requiring constant vigilance and innovation to combat technological obsolescence and copyright restrictions. Yet, the enduring presence of “Lie with Me” (2005) within the Internet Archive serves as a testament to the power of digital archiving and the enduring human desire to preserve and share cultural heritage, creating a historical cultural understanding among its watchers.
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Search “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive”
The pursuit of a specific film title within the digital realm often raises a host of questions. These FAQs aim to address common inquiries surrounding the search term “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive,” navigating the complexities of online film access and copyright considerations.
Question 1: Is the mere act of searching for “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” illegal?
The digital trails one leaves are often misunderstood. The search itself is not an act of illegality. The search query is similar to walking into a public library and looking for a specific book. The transgression, if any, arises from the subsequent action taken, such as downloading or streaming a copyrighted film without proper authorization. Ones intentions alone do not trigger legal repercussions; it is the manifestation of those intentions that matters.
Question 2: Does the presence of “Lie with Me” (2005) on the Internet Archive guarantee its legality?
The digital landscape is filled with mirages. The appearance of “Lie with Me” (2005) on the Internet Archive, or any similar platform, should not be construed as an implicit endorsement of its legality. Digital repositories, while often striving to comply with copyright laws, are not immune to oversight or potential infringement. The responsibility rests upon the individual viewer to verify the film’s lawful status and adhere to the platform’s terms of service. Think of the Internet Archive as a vast marketplace; not every vendor possesses legitimate wares.
Question 3: What are the potential consequences of streaming or downloading “Lie with Me” (2005) from an unauthorized source?
The digital world is not without its shadows. Streaming or downloading “Lie with Me” (2005) from an unauthorized source exposes one to a range of potential ramifications, from cease-and-desist letters to monetary penalties levied by copyright holders. While prosecution for individual acts of infringement may be rare, the risk remains, a constant undercurrent in the digital sea. The allure of free access should not blind one to the inherent dangers of copyright violation; the piper must always be paid.
Question 4: If the Internet Archive is a non-profit organization, does that exempt it from copyright laws?
Benevolence does not grant immunity. The Internet Archive’s non-profit status, while commendable, does not absolve it from adhering to copyright regulations. The organization remains subject to the same legal constraints as any commercial entity, obligated to respect the rights of copyright holders. The archive may operate with noble intentions, but it cannot circumvent the laws that govern intellectual property. Even saints must obey the law of the land.
Question 5: Is there a statute of limitations for copyright infringement related to streaming or downloading a film?
Time erodes all, but not always. A statute of limitations does exist for copyright infringement, typically ranging from three to five years, depending on the jurisdiction. However, the clock does not begin ticking until the infringement is discovered. The ephemeral nature of digital activity does not guarantee immunity; digital breadcrumbs can linger for years, potentially leading to belated legal action. One should not assume that time will erase all traces of transgression.
Question 6: Does “fair use” apply to streaming or downloading “Lie with Me” (2005) for personal enjoyment?
The path of “fair use” is narrow and treacherous. Streaming or downloading “Lie with Me” (2005) solely for personal enjoyment rarely, if ever, falls under the umbrella of fair use. This legal doctrine typically applies to transformative uses of copyrighted material, such as criticism, commentary, or parody, not to simple consumption. The desire for entertainment does not justify copyright infringement; one must tread carefully when invoking the principle of fair use. Personal entertainment is the least likely use to be considered fair in the eyes of the law.
In essence, the search for “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” highlights the tension between the desire for accessible content and the legal framework governing intellectual property. A responsible approach necessitates informed awareness and adherence to copyright laws, navigating the digital landscape with caution and respect for the rights of creators.
The exploration now shifts to the ethical dimensions of accessing copyrighted material online, delving into the moral considerations that accompany the pursuit of readily available films.
Digital Artifacts
The quest triggered by “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” resembles navigating uncharted waters, where the promise of cinematic treasure is often guarded by hidden reefs. Proceed with caution and informed awareness.
Tip 1: Verify Source Legitimacy: The digital facade often masks reality. A website proclaiming free access to “Lie with Me” (2005) may be a haven for malware or a purveyor of pirated content. Cross-reference the site with reputable sources, scrutinize user reviews, and investigate its ownership. Treat every claim with skepticism, for not all glitters are gold.
Tip 2: Respect Copyright Boundaries: The lines separating permissible and unlawful access are often blurred. Understand that simply finding “Lie with Me” (2005) online does not grant license to stream or download it freely. Familiarize oneself with copyright laws and be mindful of the rights of creators and distributors. To cross the legal boundary is to invite potential repercussions.
Tip 3: Explore Alternative Channels: The internet is not the sole repository of cinematic works. Consider exploring legitimate streaming services, libraries, or purchasing the film through authorized retailers. Though requiring financial investment, these alternatives offer a legal and ethical pathway to enjoying “Lie with Me” (2005). Legitimacy offers peace of mind.
Tip 4: Beware of Suspicious Downloads: The promise of a “full movie” can often conceal malicious intent. Exercise extreme caution when downloading files from unknown sources, as they may contain viruses, spyware, or other harmful software. Verify file extensions, scan downloaded files with antivirus software, and be wary of requests for personal information. Trust in caution, not blind faith.
Tip 5: Utilize VPNs Responsibly: Virtual Private Networks can circumvent geographical restrictions, but they do not absolve users of legal responsibility. While VPNs can offer a degree of anonymity, they cannot shield one from copyright infringement. Use VPNs judiciously and ethically, respecting the laws of both your location and the location of the content you are accessing. Technology is a tool, not a shield.
Tip 6: Support Filmmakers Directly: The digital ecosystem thrives on patronage. Consider supporting the creators of “Lie with Me” (2005) by purchasing their work, attending their screenings, or contributing to their crowdfunding campaigns. Direct support fosters a healthy and sustainable film industry, ensuring that future generations can enjoy diverse and compelling cinematic experiences. Investment in art yields lasting returns.
These guidelines offer a path through the digital wilderness, a reminder that the pursuit of cinematic enjoyment should not come at the expense of ethical conduct and legal compliance. Let awareness be one’s guide.
The narrative shifts now, as we conclude this exploration with a call for ethical engagement with copyrighted material.
The Echo Fades
The digital footprint of “lie with me 2005 full movie internet archive” extends beyond the screen, resonating through the corridors of copyright law, ethical consumption, and the enduring pursuit of cultural artifacts. This journey, initiated by a simple search query, revealed a complex tapestry woven with threads of legal responsibility, archival significance, and the persistent tension between access and control. The quest for a cinematic experience unveiled a deeper exploration of digital citizenship, urging responsible engagement with the vast, often unregulated, digital sphere.
As the echo of the search fades, a challenge remains. Let informed awareness guide navigation through the digital landscape, recognizing the power each click holds. Let the pursuit of entertainment be tempered with ethical considerations, honoring the creative spirit and respecting the rights of those who bring stories to life. The choice rests with each individual: to be a responsible steward of digital content, or a silent participant in its erosion. The preservation of art demands not just access, but also integrity.
