A collective of legal professionals, often attorneys, offering alternative dispute resolution services in a specific state. These entities facilitate communication and negotiation between parties involved in a disagreement, with the goal of reaching a mutually agreeable resolution outside of traditional litigation. The services they offer typically encompass facilitating settlements in various civil disputes, ranging from business disagreements to family law matters.
The existence of such organizations provides a crucial avenue for individuals and businesses seeking efficient and cost-effective means of resolving conflicts. Benefits include reduced legal expenses, faster resolution times compared to court proceedings, and greater control over the outcome. Historically, the rise of these groups reflects a growing recognition of the limitations and burdens associated with conventional litigation, prompting a shift towards collaborative and less adversarial methods of conflict resolution.
The following sections will explore key aspects of these dispute resolution practices, including the specific advantages they offer, the types of cases they handle, and the selection criteria to consider when seeking assistance in resolving disagreements.
1. Neutrality
Within the intricate landscape of legal disputes, especially in a state as dynamic as California, the concept of neutrality stands as the bedrock upon which the legitimacy and effectiveness of a dispute resolution professional is built. It is the silent promise, the unwritten contract between all parties, ensuring a fair and unbiased path towards resolution.
-
The Impartial Arbiter
A dispute resolution professional, affiliated or part of a law group, must approach each case without pre-existing biases or allegiances. This requires a delicate balancing act, understanding the nuances of each party’s perspective without advocating for either. Consider a partnership dissolution, rife with accusations and mistrust. The professional, like a skilled navigator, must chart a course through these turbulent waters, relying solely on the facts and the law, not on personal sympathies.
-
Transparency and Disclosure
Neutrality demands transparency. Any potential conflicts of interest, no matter how minor, must be disclosed. Perhaps the professional previously represented a similar business of one party, or shares a professional association with one of the attorneys involved. Failure to reveal such connections undermines the integrity of the process and taints the outcome. This transparency builds trust, a crucial element for productive negotiation.
-
Equal Opportunity for Voice
True neutrality ensures each party has an equal opportunity to present their case, to be heard, and to respond to opposing arguments. It means actively managing power imbalances, ensuring that no single voice dominates the proceedings. In scenarios involving significant disparities in resources or legal representation, the professional must proactively create a level playing field, facilitating equitable participation and preventing coercion.
-
Outcome Independence
The measure of neutrality is not in achieving a specific outcome, but in ensuring a fair process. The dispute resolution professional does not have a vested interest in whether a particular settlement is reached. Their role is to facilitate dialogue, explore options, and guide parties toward a mutually acceptable resolution, not to dictate the terms. This independence is critical for maintaining the integrity of the process and ensuring that the final agreement is truly consensual.
In essence, the unwavering commitment to neutrality is what separates a professional striving for genuine resolution from one merely seeking to expedite a legal process. Within any organization offering such services, this principle is paramount, the ethical compass guiding every interaction and decision.
2. Confidentiality
Within the walls of any dispute resolution firm in California, a solemn promise echoes: confidentiality. It is the invisible shield, the unspoken pact that transforms a room of adversaries into a space of potentially shared solutions. It is the bedrock upon which trust, often fractured, can tentatively begin to rebuild. The weight of this principle bears directly upon the effectiveness of these organizations.
Consider a high-stakes intellectual property dispute between two tech giants. Both guard their trade secrets with ferocious intensity. Absent the guarantee of strict confidentiality, neither would dare reveal the inner workings of their innovations, even under controlled circumstances. These negotiations hinge on the assurance that proprietary information shared during the process will not leak into the competitive landscape. The professionals facilitating the discussion act as guardians of this trust, bound by ethical obligations and, often, contractual agreements to protect the sensitive data disclosed.
Or imagine a complex family business succumbing to internal conflict. Accusations of financial mismanagement, sibling rivalry, and long-held resentments simmer beneath the surface. The success of any attempt to mediate a resolution depends entirely on the confidentiality surrounding those delicate conversations. The family must feel secure in expressing their grievances, airing their concerns, and exploring compromises without fear that their words will be weaponized in future legal battles or become fodder for family gossip. Without this safety net, the wounds would fester, and the business, and family ties, would likely crumble. The professionals, operating under the banner of discretion, provide this critical assurance. In conclusion, confidentiality is not merely a procedural formality; it is the lifeblood of dispute resolution, enabling honest dialogue and fostering the potential for meaningful settlement. It allows those in disagreement to be transparent to find solutions.
3. Negotiation
Within the legal tapestry of California, the thread of negotiation, handled skillfully, often proves more potent than the sharpest courtroom argument. For a mediator law group, the ability to orchestrate effective negotiation isn’t merely a service; it’s the very essence of their purpose, the keystone upon which their success hinges.
-
Strategic Assessment and Preparation
Before entering any negotiation, a reputable group meticulously assesses the case, identifying key issues, potential sticking points, and each party’s underlying interests. This preparatory phase resembles a cartographer charting unknown territory, seeking to understand the landscape before embarking on a journey. For instance, in a complex business dispute, a group might analyze financial records, market trends, and contractual obligations to formulate a comprehensive strategy, ensuring they approach the negotiation table armed with knowledge and foresight.
-
Facilitation of Constructive Dialogue
Negotiation, especially when emotions run high, often devolves into a shouting match, a contest of wills rather than a search for common ground. A skilled group acts as a conductor, guiding the orchestra of dialogue, ensuring each instrument (party) is heard, and preventing discord from derailing the melody of progress. Consider a contentious divorce proceeding: a group might employ active listening techniques, reframe inflammatory statements, and establish ground rules to foster a more respectful and productive exchange, ultimately creating an environment conducive to settlement.
-
Creative Problem-Solving
Sometimes, the path to resolution isn’t a straight line but a winding road through unexplored territory. An effective group excels at creative problem-solving, identifying innovative solutions that might not be immediately apparent to the parties involved. In a real estate dispute, for example, a group might propose alternative payment schedules, phased property transfers, or even joint ventures to bridge the gap between seemingly irreconcilable demands. They act as architects, designing bespoke solutions tailored to the unique circumstances of each case.
-
Closing and Formalization
The art of negotiation finds its crescendo in the closure of the deal. An organization will ensure that all terms are clear, concise, and accurately reflect the agreement reached. They guide the formalization of settlement documents to prevent future misunderstandings or disputes over interpretation, cementing the consensus and ensuring the results of successful negotiation are legally sound and durable.
The proficiency in each of these aspects underscores the value a qualified mediator law group brings to the table. They serve not just as facilitators but as strategic advisors, skilled communicators, and creative problem-solvers, guiding parties toward mutually agreeable resolutions that often prove far more beneficial than the uncertainties and expenses of traditional litigation. Without such capabilities, true negotiated outcomes remain elusive, leaving clients mired in conflict.
4. Settlement Agreements
In the intricate dance of legal disputes, particularly those navigated within the complex legal landscape of California, the settlement agreement emerges as a crucial destination. It’s the agreed-upon endpoint, the written embodiment of compromise forged often with the assistance of a mediator law group. It’s a testament to resolution achieved outside the courtrooms adversarial arena, a negotiated peace that can save time, resources, and emotional toll.
-
The Blueprint for Compliance
A settlement agreement isn’t merely a handshake deal; it’s a legally binding contract, outlining specific obligations for each party involved. Consider a construction defect case mediated by a California firm. The agreement might detail the scope of repairs, the timeline for completion, and the monetary compensation to be paid. Its the blueprint for future actions, ensuring that promises are kept and disputes are avoided. Without this clarity, the resolution crumbles.
-
Enforceability in the Courts
The true strength of a settlement agreement lies in its enforceability. Should a party fail to uphold their end of the bargain, the other can seek recourse through the courts. The California courts, while favoring settlement, will rigorously examine the agreement to ensure it’s fair, unambiguous, and free from coercion. A mediator law group, recognizing this scrutiny, plays a vital role in crafting agreements that withstand legal challenges. They ensure proper language is used to produce a contract.
-
Confidentiality Clauses and Public Record
Many settlement agreements contain confidentiality clauses, shielding the details of the resolution from public view. This is particularly valuable in cases involving sensitive business information or personal matters. However, it’s essential to understand the limitations of confidentiality. While the terms of the settlement may be kept secret, the fact that a settlement was reached is often a matter of public record. A competent group can advise clients on the scope and implications of these clauses.
-
Release of Claims and Future Liability
A well-drafted settlement agreement includes a comprehensive release of claims, preventing parties from revisiting the dispute in the future. This release should be carefully tailored to cover all potential claims arising from the underlying incident or transaction. For instance, in a personal injury case, the agreement should release the defendant from all liability for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. The mediator law group helps to negotiate and formalize these terms, ensuring that the agreement provides genuine and lasting closure. Because you do not want to have liability issues.
These facets highlight the crucial role settlement agreements play in resolving disputes, offering a structured, enforceable, and often confidential alternative to litigation. A mediator law group helps with ensuring the agreements are strong and serve their intended purpose.
5. Alternative Dispute Resolution
In California, where legal complexities often demand efficient and innovative solutions, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has emerged not merely as a supplementary tool but as a cornerstone of the legal system. The rise of ADR reflects a collective shift towards resolving conflicts outside the traditional courtroom, emphasizing collaboration, negotiation, and mediation. This transformation is embodied in the specialized services offered by mediator law groups throughout the state.
-
The Spectrum of ADR Methods
ADR encompasses a variety of techniques, each offering a unique approach to conflict resolution. Mediation, arbitration, and neutral evaluation represent the most commonly employed methods. Mediation involves a neutral third party, the mediator, facilitating communication and guiding parties toward a mutually acceptable agreement. Arbitration, on the other hand, presents a more formal process akin to a mini-trial, where an arbitrator renders a binding decision. Neutral evaluation offers an early assessment of the case’s strengths and weaknesses, helping parties gauge the likelihood of success at trial. A mediator law group California will typically provide a range of these ADR services depending on the needs of each case.
-
Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary drivers behind the growing popularity of ADR is its ability to resolve disputes more quickly and affordably than traditional litigation. Court proceedings can be protracted, expensive, and emotionally draining. ADR, by contrast, offers a streamlined process, often leading to resolution in a matter of weeks or months, rather than years. This efficiency translates into significant cost savings for parties involved, reducing legal fees, expert witness expenses, and other related costs. Mediator law groups in California streamline resolution process to offer solutions outside long litigations.
-
Preserving Relationships
Unlike the adversarial nature of litigation, ADR emphasizes collaboration and mutual understanding. This approach is particularly valuable in disputes where maintaining ongoing relationships is important, such as business partnerships, family conflicts, or employer-employee disagreements. Mediation, in particular, fosters open communication and encourages parties to find common ground, preserving relationships that might otherwise be irreparably damaged by the adversarial process of a trial. Parties can remain friends and business partners and use ADR to solve disputes.
-
Flexibility and Control
ADR offers a level of flexibility and control that is often absent in court proceedings. Parties can tailor the ADR process to meet their specific needs and preferences, choosing the method, the mediator or arbitrator, and the rules of engagement. This flexibility empowers parties to shape the resolution process and ensures that their voices are heard. In mediation, for example, the parties retain ultimate control over the outcome, as the mediator cannot impose a settlement. This control and collaboration make mediation a valuable strategy.
The connection between Alternative Dispute Resolution and mediator law groups in California is symbiotic. These groups serve as hubs of expertise, offering a diverse range of ADR services and guiding parties through the process with skill and impartiality. By embracing ADR, individuals and businesses can navigate legal disputes more efficiently, cost-effectively, and collaboratively, preserving relationships and fostering a more harmonious legal landscape. These organizations’ impact are tangible.
6. Legal Expertise
The narrative of a “mediator law group california” is intrinsically interwoven with the strength and breadth of its legal expertise. It is the foundation upon which its credibility rests, and the compass guiding its navigation through the often-turbulent waters of legal disputes. Picture a family business, generations in the making, now threatened by a bitter inheritance battle. Without a team deeply versed in California probate law, business valuation, and family dynamics, a “mediator law group california” would be ill-equipped to effectively guide the warring factions toward a mutually agreeable resolution. The expertise becomes the essential tool in deconstructing the complex web of assets, liabilities, and emotional grievances.
Consider, conversely, the potential consequences of a “mediator law group california” operating with deficient legal acumen. Imagine a breach of contract dispute between two technology companies. If the group lacks a thorough understanding of intellectual property law, software licensing, and contractual obligations, it could inadvertently lead the parties to an agreement that is either unenforceable or unduly favors one side. The absence of expertise can transform the mediation process from a pathway to resolution into a minefield of legal pitfalls. Expertise, in this context, ensures a resolution will stand up in court.
In summary, legal expertise is not merely an ancillary attribute of a “mediator law group california”; it is its lifeblood. It empowers the group to accurately assess the legal landscape, identify potential risks and opportunities, and craft creative solutions that are both legally sound and practically feasible. Without this bedrock of knowledge, the “mediator law group california” becomes akin to a ship without a rudder, adrift in the vast ocean of legal complexities, ultimately failing to reach its intended destination: a fair, efficient, and lasting resolution. The success of ADR is hinged on a command of legal expertise and mediation.
7. Client Advocacy
Within the structured process facilitated by a “mediator law group california”, client advocacy takes on a nuanced form, diverging from its more aggressive manifestation in traditional litigation. Here, it isn’t about overpowering the opposition, but about strategically and ethically representing a client’s interests within the collaborative framework of mediation.
-
Strategic Goal Identification
Prior to entering any mediation session, a reputable “mediator law group california” invests considerable effort in understanding a clients ultimate objectives. This extends beyond merely acknowledging surface-level demands, probing deeper to uncover the core needs and priorities driving their position. For example, in a partnership dispute, a client might initially demand a significant financial payout. However, careful exploration might reveal their primary concern is preserving their reputation within the industry. The group can then tailor its advocacy to prioritize these underlying interests, potentially leading to a more creative and mutually beneficial resolution that litigation might never uncover.
-
Educated Empowerment
Client advocacy in the context of mediation also entails thoroughly educating clients about the process, their legal rights, and the potential outcomes. This empowers them to make informed decisions throughout the negotiation, understanding the implications of each concession and proposal. A “mediator law group california” committed to advocacy ensures clients grasp the strengths and weaknesses of their case, setting realistic expectations and preventing them from making impulsive choices driven by emotion rather than reasoned judgment. They also make sure to follow all guidelines set by the State Bar of California.
-
Principled Negotiation
While mediation emphasizes collaboration, client advocacy still demands skillful negotiation. A “mediator law group california” will adeptly present their client’s case, articulating their position persuasively and countering opposing arguments with factual evidence and legal precedent. The focus, however, remains on finding common ground rather than escalating conflict. The group strives to achieve the best possible outcome for their client while maintaining the integrity of the mediation process and fostering a respectful dialogue with the other party.
-
Safeguarding Client Autonomy
Ultimately, a cornerstone of client advocacy in mediation is respecting and safeguarding the client’s autonomy. A “mediator law group california” recognizes that the final decision rests solely with the client, regardless of their advice or recommendations. The group’s role is to provide guidance, support, and strategic insight, but never to pressure or coerce the client into accepting a settlement that does not align with their best interests. This commitment to client autonomy ensures that the mediation process remains empowering and client-centered.
These diverse facets of client advocacy collectively paint a picture of a strategic, ethical, and empowering approach within the framework of mediation. The “mediator law group california” acts not as a legal gladiator, but as a trusted advisor, skillfully navigating the complexities of negotiation while fiercely protecting their client’s interests. The results are effective, ethical, and within the standard of care.
8. Cost Efficiency
The phrase “mediator law group california” often conjures images of complex legal battles, but a lesser-known truth resides in its potential for financial prudence. In a state where legal fees can escalate rapidly, these groups offer a pathway towards resolving disputes with an eye towards fiscal responsibility.
-
Reduced Litigation Expenses
The most immediate area of cost savings stems from avoiding protracted court battles. Litigation necessitates extensive discovery, court filings, and attorney appearances, all of which accumulate significant expenses. A “mediator law group california” aims to resolve matters through negotiation and compromise, significantly curtailing these expenditures. Consider a business dispute where a trial could easily cost each party hundreds of thousands of dollars. A mediated settlement, achieved in a fraction of the time, could reduce those expenses by an order of magnitude.
-
Faster Resolution Time
Time is money, and the prolonged nature of litigation can have a cascading effect on financial resources. The quicker a dispute is resolved, the sooner businesses can refocus their energies and resources on productive endeavors. “Mediator law group california” facilitates this expedited resolution, minimizing the disruption to business operations and allowing for a swifter return to profitability. Imagine a construction company embroiled in a contract dispute. Every day spent in court is a day that construction projects are delayed, impacting revenue and potentially damaging the company’s reputation. Swift mediation averts these compounding losses.
-
Predictable Costs
Litigation is often characterized by its unpredictability. The outcome is uncertain, and the associated costs can fluctuate wildly depending on unforeseen circumstances. Mediation, on the other hand, offers a more predictable cost structure. Parties typically agree to share the mediator’s fees, and the process is generally more contained, allowing for better budgeting and financial planning. Consider a divorce proceeding. Legal fees can spiral out of control as emotions escalate and litigation becomes more entrenched. Mediation, with its structured approach and transparent costs, provides a degree of financial certainty during a turbulent time.
-
Opportunity Cost Mitigation
Beyond direct legal fees, disputes consume valuable time and attention from key personnel. Executives and employees become embroiled in the intricacies of the legal battle, diverting their focus from core business functions. A “mediator law group california” alleviates this burden by providing a dedicated team to manage the resolution process, freeing up internal resources to concentrate on revenue-generating activities. Envision a tech startup facing a patent infringement lawsuit. The founders’ time and energy are crucial for innovation and growth. By engaging a mediator, they can delegate the legal wrangling and remain focused on building their company.
These savings interlock and serve as a compelling argument for engaging a “mediator law group california”. The advantages extend beyond mere cost reduction, promoting efficiency, predictability, and the preservation of valuable resources. These groups provide a pragmatic solution for navigating legal challenges without incurring the full financial brunt of traditional litigation, serving as a strategic advantage in today’s competitive market.
Frequently Asked Questions
The path to resolution is rarely straightforward. Many questions arise when considering alternatives to traditional litigation. The following addresses common inquiries surrounding the function and value of dispute resolution professionals in the Golden State.
Question 1: What distinguishes a mediator law group in California from a standard law firm?
The legal landscape is populated by firms engaged primarily in advocacy, representing clients in court. A mediator law group, however, focuses on facilitating settlement. While its members are often attorneys with substantial litigation experience, their objective shifts from adversarial representation to impartial facilitation. They guide parties toward mutual agreement rather than directly advocating for one side’s victory. Think of it as the difference between a general leading troops into battle and a diplomat brokering a peace treaty.
Question 2: Is information disclosed during mediation protected?
Confidentiality stands as a cornerstone of the mediation process. California law provides significant protections for information shared during mediation sessions. Unless explicitly agreed otherwise, statements made, documents exchanged, and offers proposed are generally inadmissible in subsequent court proceedings. This confidentiality encourages open communication and fosters a climate of trust, allowing parties to explore potential resolutions without fear of self-incrimination or strategic disadvantage. It’s a sanctuary of candor in the often-guarded world of legal disputes.
Question 3: Can the mediator make a decision for the parties if they reach an impasse?
In mediation, the power to decide ultimately rests with the parties themselves. The mediator’s role is to facilitate discussion, explore options, and help identify common ground, but they lack the authority to impose a settlement. Unlike an arbitrator, who renders a binding decision, the mediator serves as a neutral guide, empowering parties to craft their own resolution. The process emphasizes self-determination, placing control in the hands of those most directly affected by the outcome.
Question 4: What types of cases are suitable for resolution through a mediator law group?
The scope of cases amenable to mediation is remarkably broad, encompassing a spectrum of disputes from business disagreements and contract breaches to family law matters and real estate conflicts. The common thread is a willingness from both parties to engage in good-faith negotiation. Even seemingly intractable disputes can benefit from the structured dialogue and creative problem-solving techniques employed by skilled mediators. It is a process that seeks common ground to solve disagreements.
Question 5: How is the cost of mediation determined, and who is responsible for payment?
Mediation fees vary depending on the complexity of the case, the experience of the mediator, and the duration of the process. Typically, the parties agree to share the mediator’s fees equally, although alternative arrangements can be negotiated. The overall cost, however, is generally significantly lower than that of traditional litigation. Many groups offer transparent fee schedules, allowing parties to budget accordingly. It is a cost-effective solution.
Question 6: What happens if mediation is unsuccessful?
While the goal of mediation is always to reach a mutually agreeable settlement, not all mediations result in a resolution. If an impasse is reached, the parties retain their right to pursue other legal options, including litigation. However, the time and effort invested in mediation are rarely wasted, as the process often clarifies the issues in dispute, narrows the scope of disagreement, and lays the groundwork for more efficient resolution through alternative means. The process provides clarity for all sides of disagreements.
In essence, these services provide a structured, confidential, and cost-effective alternative to traditional litigation, empowering parties to control their own destiny and craft solutions tailored to their specific needs.
The subsequent sections will address strategies for identifying and selecting a “mediator law group california” best suited to your individual circumstances.
Selecting a Mediator Law Group California
The selection of a dispute resolution facilitator represents a critical juncture in any legal conflict. The wrong choice can prolong the process, escalate costs, and ultimately undermine the chances of a favorable outcome. The following guidelines, distilled from years of observation, aim to equip individuals with the tools to make informed decisions, navigating the landscape of dispute resolution professionals with greater confidence.
Tip 1: Prioritize Expertise Relevant to the Dispute.
A group specializing in family law may not be the ideal choice for a complex business dispute. Conversely, a firm steeped in corporate litigation might lack the sensitivity required for delicate family matters. Examine the group’s track record. Seek specific experience in the relevant area of law. Has the group successfully mediated similar cases? Request anonymized case studies or testimonials. A deep understanding of the legal nuances at play is crucial for effective facilitation.
Tip 2: Scrutinize the Mediator’s Style and Approach.
Different mediators adopt different approaches. Some favor a more directive style, actively guiding parties toward a specific outcome. Others prefer a facilitative approach, empowering parties to reach their own conclusions. Consider the nature of the dispute and the personalities involved. Would a more assertive mediator be beneficial in breaking through entrenched positions, or would a more collaborative approach be more conducive to fostering trust? Inquire about the mediator’s preferred methods and philosophy.
Tip 3: Assess Communication Skills and Active Listening.
Effective communication forms the bedrock of successful mediation. The mediator must be adept at clearly articulating complex legal concepts, facilitating constructive dialogue, and actively listening to the concerns of all parties involved. Observe the mediator’s communication style during the initial consultation. Do they listen attentively? Do they respond thoughtfully? Can they explain legal jargon in plain language? A mediator who struggles to communicate effectively will struggle to facilitate resolution.
Tip 4: Inquire About Conflict Resolution Training and Certifications.
Formal training and certifications demonstrate a commitment to professional development and adherence to ethical standards. Look for mediators who have completed recognized training programs in conflict resolution and who are certified by reputable organizations. While certifications do not guarantee success, they provide assurance that the mediator possesses a foundational understanding of mediation principles and techniques.
Tip 5: Check References and Seek Peer Recommendations.
Direct feedback from past clients provides invaluable insight into the mediator’s competence and professionalism. Request references and take the time to contact them. Ask about their experience with the mediator, the outcome of the mediation, and any challenges encountered. Additionally, seek recommendations from other legal professionals, such as attorneys or judges, who may have firsthand knowledge of the mediator’s reputation.
Tip 6: Prioritize Neutrality and Impartiality.
A mediator’s neutrality is paramount. Any hint of bias or favoritism can undermine the integrity of the process and erode trust. Inquire about potential conflicts of interest and carefully assess the mediator’s demeanor during the initial consultation. Do they appear genuinely impartial, or do they seem to favor one party over another? A truly neutral mediator will approach the dispute with objectivity and fairness.
Selecting the appropriate dispute resolution professional requires diligence, careful consideration, and a willingness to look beyond superficial credentials. The commitment to a measured approach maximizes the likelihood of a just and efficient resolution. Consider the suggestions carefully.
The subsequent section will synthesize the principles to formulate a comprehensive conclusion.
Mediator Law Group California
The preceding exploration has charted the course through the multifaceted landscape of “mediator law group california,” illuminating its critical role in alternative dispute resolution. From the bedrock principle of neutrality to the enforceable power of settlement agreements, these groups offer a structured and often more amicable pathway to resolving conflicts than the traditional courtroom. The careful balance of legal expertise, client advocacy, and cost-efficiency underscores their value in a legal system often perceived as complex and adversarial.
The story does not end with mere understanding, but with action. When faced with the daunting prospect of legal conflict, consider the potential benefits of engaging a “mediator law group california.” Explore the options, ask the difficult questions, and choose wisely. The choice can mark the difference between prolonged strife and a swift, equitable resolution, shaping not only the outcome of the dispute but also the future relationship between the parties involved. The crossroads are clearly marked; the direction chosen is the individual’s responsibility.
