Uncertainty surrounding evidence or testimony within the context of fictionalized investigations of sexually based offenses is a recurring theme. This narrative element can manifest as skepticism from investigators, prosecutors, defense attorneys, jurors, or even victims themselves, impacting the progression and outcome of simulated legal proceedings.
The presence of this element serves several functions. It introduces realism, reflecting the complexities and ambiguities inherent in actual investigations. It can generate suspense, keeping viewers engaged as the veracity of claims and reliability of witnesses are challenged. Further, it provides opportunities to explore ethical dilemmas faced by those involved in the pursuit of justice.
