The phrase in question suggests a potential strategy or decision made by the city of Tulsa to forgo participation in certain competitive events or activities. This could encompass various domains, such as bidding for large-scale sporting events, engaging in inter-city economic competitions, or participating in political initiatives. An example would be Tulsa choosing not to bid on hosting the Olympics despite other cities actively pursuing the opportunity.
Choosing to abstain from such engagements can stem from various motivations. These might include prioritizing fiscal responsibility by avoiding the often substantial financial burdens associated with hosting major events. Alternative rationales could involve a strategic redirection of resources toward other community development projects deemed more beneficial, or a philosophical disagreement with the values or practices associated with the particular competition. Historically, cities have made similar decisions when the perceived costs outweigh the anticipated benefits, leading to a reassessment of participation.
