A collection of aftermarket components designed to alter the exterior appearance of a specific model year vehicle. These kits typically include parts such as front and rear bumpers, side skirts, and potentially a rear spoiler or wing. These components are often constructed from materials like fiberglass, polyurethane, or carbon fiber.
Modifying a vehicle’s aesthetics through the application of such a set can achieve a more aggressive, personalized look. Historically, these modifications have been popular amongst automotive enthusiasts seeking to enhance the visual appeal and, in some cases, the aerodynamic properties of their vehicles. The benefits extend to individual expression and potentially improved airflow management, although aerodynamic gains often require professional installation and tuning.
The following sections will delve into specific aspects of modifying a 2015 vehicle’s exterior. We will examine design considerations, material options, installation procedures, and potential impacts on vehicle performance and value.
1. Aerodynamic Influence
The curvature of a vehicle’s surface dictates how air flows. The inclusion of a modification set can profoundly alter this flow, influencing stability, drag, and downforce. Consider the addition of a front splitter; correctly designed, it reduces air flowing beneath the chassis, creating a low-pressure zone and, consequently, increased downforce on the front tires. This enhancement, however, is not inherent to all aftermarket components. Poorly designed parts may create turbulence, increasing drag and potentially destabilizing the vehicle at higher speeds. A prime example occurred in 2017 when several aftermarket suppliers released visually similar kits for a competitive racing series. Field testing revealed significant discrepancies in aerodynamic performance, with some kits actively hindering performance compared to the stock configuration.
The effectiveness of these components relies on careful engineering and testing, often involving wind tunnel analysis or computational fluid dynamics simulations. Merely bolting on a visually appealing piece may not yield the intended aerodynamic benefits and could even prove detrimental. Furthermore, the impact extends beyond straight-line speed. Modifications to the rear of the vehicle, such as a wing or diffuser, can affect cornering grip and stability, particularly in high-speed turns. The relationship is complex and requires a nuanced understanding of fluid dynamics to achieve tangible improvements.
Ultimately, aerodynamic modifications represent a gamble. The potential rewardincreased stability, improved handling, and reduced dragis significant. However, the risk of unintended consequencesincreased drag, reduced stability, and compromised fuel efficiencyis equally real. Thorough research, careful selection of components from reputable manufacturers, and professional installation are essential to harness the beneficial aspects and mitigate potential drawbacks. The connection between modified aesthetics and aerodynamic performance is not merely cosmetic; it is a fundamental aspect of vehicle dynamics that demands respect and understanding.
2. Material Durability
The biting wind off Lake Michigan held a particular cruelty that winter. Salt trucks worked overtime, leaving a corrosive residue on every surface. A 2015 vehicle, meticulously fitted with an aftermarket modification set constructed primarily of fiberglass, stood as a testament to ambition. The owner, eager to distinguish his vehicle, had opted for the lighter, ostensibly more affordable option. Within months, hairline fractures began to appear around the mounting points of the front bumper. The relentless freeze-thaw cycle expanded the fissures, allowing water to seep into the fiberglass weave. By spring, the bumper resembled a jigsaw puzzle held together by little more than hope and several layers of automotive paint. This incident serves as a stark reminder that material durability is not merely a specification; it’s the cornerstone of longevity in automotive enhancements.
The connection between the material composition of a modification set and its susceptibility to environmental degradation is direct. Polyurethane, known for its flexibility and impact resistance, fares considerably better under similar conditions. It absorbs minor impacts without cracking and resists the corrosive effects of road salt and UV radiation. Carbon fiber, while offering superior strength-to-weight ratio, can be prone to delamination if improperly manufactured or exposed to prolonged UV exposure without adequate protective coatings. The selection of a material, therefore, transcends aesthetic considerations; it demands a thorough evaluation of the vehicle’s intended use and the prevailing environmental conditions. A track-focused vehicle in a dry climate might benefit from the weight savings of carbon fiber, while a daily driver in a region with harsh winters would be better served by the resilience of polyurethane.
Ultimately, the pursuit of visual distinction should not eclipse the importance of material integrity. The anecdote of the fractured fiberglass bumper illustrates a fundamental truth: a visually striking modification set is rendered worthless if it cannot withstand the rigors of daily use. Investing in durable materials is not merely an expense; it is an investment in the longevity and overall value of the vehicle. The wise enthusiast recognizes that the true measure of a modification’s worth lies not only in its appearance but also in its capacity to endure the trials of time and the elements.
3. Design Compatibility
The aesthetic harmony between aftermarket exterior enhancements and the factory design language of a vehicle is paramount. A discordant integration risks transforming a potential enhancement into a visual detraction. For the 2015 model, the inherent lines and contours established by the manufacturer set the parameters for successful modification. The challenge lies in respecting these parameters while simultaneously achieving a personalized aesthetic.
-
Flow and Integration
The degree to which a new component complements the existing lines of the vehicle dictates visual success. A seamlessly integrated front lip, for instance, extends the factory bumper’s lines without appearing grafted on. Contrarily, ill-fitting side skirts that create awkward gaps or disrupt the car’s visual flow detract from the overall appearance. An instance in point involved a tuner show, where a vehicle showcased a rear wing that was drastically out of proportion with the rest of the car; this disproportionate element drew negative attention and highlighted a severe lack of design consideration.
-
Proportion and Scale
Matching sizes and dimensions between added components and the car’s original design is key to maintain visual balance. For example, adding a massive, oversized rear wing can overwhelm the sleek lines of the 2015 model, creating an unbalanced and comical look. Conversely, a subtle rear diffuser that complements the existing bumper’s lower section can enhance the car’s sporty appeal without disrupting its overall proportions. The aim is to enhance, not overshadow, the original design.
-
Style Consistency
The design vocabulary of aftermarket components should align with the vehicle’s inherent style. A vintage-inspired body kit grafted onto a modern vehicle can create a jarring disconnect. For the 2015 model, maintaining a sporty, contemporary aesthetic is crucial. Components with sharp angles and aggressive lines are generally more fitting than those with rounded edges or a classic design. A notable example is a vehicle with chrome trims matched with sporty aftermarket set, which diluted the intended aggressive aesthetic.
-
Color Harmony
The success of design compatibility is also related to color palette. Colors of aftermarket set should align with vehicle’s color. In some cases, it is not wrong using different color to show contrast. But make sure the color harmonies each other. If you use color that too striking, it will ruin the vehicle visual.
The successful integration of exterior modifications is therefore a delicate balancing act. The goal is to enhance the vehicle’s visual appeal without compromising its inherent design language. Attention to flow, proportion, style, and detail yields a cohesive and visually pleasing result. Conversely, disregard for these elements leads to a disjointed and aesthetically displeasing outcome. The informed enthusiast understands that true enhancement lies not simply in adding components, but in artfully integrating them into the existing design.
4. Installation Complexity
The allure of transforming a vehicle’s exterior through aftermarket components often overshadows a critical reality: the intricate process of installation. The ease with which a modification set integrates with a 2015 model is not uniform; the degree of difficulty varies significantly depending on component design, material, and the end user’s skill level. The perceived simplicity of bolting on a new bumper can quickly devolve into a frustrating ordeal when faced with misaligned mounting points, incomplete hardware, or the need for specialized tools.
-
Component Fitment Discrepancies
The promise of a direct fit replacement is frequently unmet. Tolerances in manufacturing processes can lead to minor, or in some cases, substantial discrepancies between the aftermarket component and the vehicle’s factory mounting points. A seasoned mechanic recounted a tale of a seemingly straightforward side skirt installation that required hours of meticulous trimming and reshaping to achieve a flush fit. Such experiences underscore the importance of verifying compatibility before initiating the installation and the potential necessity of involving a skilled professional to overcome these fitment challenges. Incompatible components would require significant alteration that demands sophisticated tools to overcome it.
-
Wiring and Sensor Integration
Modern vehicles are replete with sensors integrated into the bumper and surrounding areas. Replacing a factory bumper with an aftermarket alternative can necessitate the transfer or adaptation of these sensors, a process that demands careful attention to wiring diagrams and electrical connections. Improper handling can trigger error codes, disable safety features, or even damage the vehicle’s electrical system. One example would be sensor parking installation. If user does not have experience about sensor parking, installation will become more complex than usual. Ignoring safety feature is very risky to be done.
-
Paint and Finish Considerations
While some kits arrive pre-painted, many require painting to match the vehicle’s existing finish. Achieving a seamless color match necessitates professional painting techniques and access to specialized equipment. Even with meticulous preparation, subtle variations in paint formulation or application can result in a noticeable color difference. This discrepancy is amplified by the effects of sun fading and aging on the original factory paint. If the base color is different, the user have to do sanding to make sure the paint is stick. This is one of the most complex consideration when doing coloring in a vehicle.
-
Tool and Skill Requirements
Installation complexity can also be viewed in terms of how many tools needed to perform installation of aftermarket set. The installation process would not be done without the right tool. Moreover, skill requirements also important to consider. Make sure you have experience in installing aftermarket set. If you do not have experience and skill, it would be better to leave to the profession to do installation. This will prevent unwanted problems if you do it alone.
The installation of aftermarket exterior components is not a purely cosmetic endeavor. It requires a blend of mechanical aptitude, electrical understanding, and attention to detail. The perceived simplicity of enhancing a vehicle’s appearance can quickly give way to the complexities of fitment discrepancies, wiring integration, and paint matching. A careful assessment of one’s capabilities and a willingness to seek professional assistance when needed are essential to ensure a successful and visually satisfying transformation of the 2015 model.
5. Paint Matching
The tale of a 2015 vehicle and its journey toward aesthetic transformation begins not with the gleam of new components, but with the subtle art of replication. The vehicle, a steadfast companion through years of sun and road, bore the marks of its journeya patina that spoke of resilience and character. The owner, seeking to infuse a new vitality, chose a body modification set, envisioning a seamless integration with the car’s existing canvas. The stage was set, but one challenge loomed large: bridging the gap between the factory’s original hue and the unpainted surface of the new additions. The task of paint matching emerged not merely as a step in the process, but as the linchpin upon which the entire project would either succeed or falter. The goal was not simply to apply color, but to replicate time, to mimic the effects of weather and wear, and to conjure a spectral likeness of the past.
The complexities deepened as the painter mixed batch after batch, each attempt falling short of the desired harmony. The original color code, readily available, proved a mere starting point. Years of exposure had subtly altered the original shade, a phenomenon compounded by variations in paint formulation and application techniques. The painter, a craftsman with years of experience, deployed a spectrum of techniques: blending, shading, and meticulously layering coats to compensate for the discrepancies. Hours turned into days as the craftsman sought to unlock the chromatic code of the vehicle, matching the new with the old. The process demands more than just technical skill, requiring insight, patience, and an almost instinctive understanding of color theory.
The resolution arrived with a final blend, a culmination of meticulous effort and intuitive judgement. The newly painted components, once disparate entities, now flowed seamlessly into the existing body, a testament to the power of accurate replication. The incident serves as a reminder that modification is an art, a dialogue between the past and the present. The careful attention to color harmony enhances vehicle design and value. Paint matching, in this context, transcends its technical definition, embodying a commitment to authenticity and aesthetic integrity. The transformed vehicle stands as a monument of the careful approach that is needed to be done in this context.
6. Component Fitment
The saga of a modified 2015 vehicle often begins with aspiration and ends with the harsh realities of manufacturing tolerances. A meticulously chosen modification set, promising a transformation of the vehicle’s exterior, can become a source of frustration if the constituent parts fail to align correctly. Component fitment, in this context, represents the critical juncture between expectation and execution. A mismatch, even by a few millimeters, can cascade into a series of complications, affecting not only the aesthetic outcome but also the structural integrity and long-term durability of the modifications. A frequent instance involved a customer ordering a complete set from an online vendor only to discover that the front bumper cover was warped and the side skirts were noticeably shorter than the vehicle’s wheelbase. This underscored the crucial point that aftermarket parts are not always created equal, and the promise of a bolt-on solution can be misleading.
The ramifications of poor component fitment extend beyond mere visual imperfections. Gaps and misalignments can create aerodynamic drag, negating any potential performance benefits intended by the design. Furthermore, stress points can develop around mounting locations, leading to premature cracking or failure of the components, particularly those made from less resilient materials like fiberglass. Water intrusion becomes a significant concern, accelerating corrosion and potentially damaging underlying body panels. The labor costs associated with correcting these issues can quickly escalate, turning a seemingly affordable modification into an expensive and time-consuming ordeal. Proper fitment requires meticulous measurement, careful adjustment, and often, the intervention of a skilled technician with experience in working with aftermarket parts. This might include modification like bending to force fit on the component.
Ultimately, the seamless integration of a modification set is a testament to the quality of the components and the precision of the installation. While visual appeal is undoubtedly a driving factor, the practical implications of component fitment cannot be overstated. The wise enthusiast prioritizes quality over cost, recognizing that a well-fitting modification set not only enhances the vehicle’s appearance but also preserves its structural integrity and long-term value. The pursuit of automotive aesthetics should be tempered with a pragmatic understanding of the engineering realities, ensuring that the transformation enhances rather than compromises the vehicle’s overall performance and reliability.
7. Structural Integrity
The pursuit of an altered aesthetic through aftermarket modifications often overshadows a fundamental concern: the impact on a vehicle’s inherent structural integrity. A 2015 model, engineered with a specific balance of rigidity and impact resistance, can have this balance disrupted by the addition of ill-conceived or poorly installed exterior components. Consider the case of a vehicle involved in a minor collision. The original bumper, designed with crumple zones to absorb impact energy, performed as intended, protecting the occupants from serious injury. However, a subsequent replacement with an aftermarket fiberglass bumper, lacking similar energy-absorbing characteristics, resulted in significantly greater damage to the vehicle’s frame in a subsequent, nearly identical incident. This anecdote underscores the reality that modifications are not always improvements; they can compromise the very safety features built into the vehicle’s design.
The connection between aftermarket exterior enhancements and structural integrity is not limited to crash scenarios. Even the seemingly innocuous addition of a large rear wing can introduce new stresses to the vehicle’s body. Improper mounting or excessive downforce can lead to fatigue cracks in the trunk lid or rear quarter panels over time. Similarly, poorly designed side skirts can act as levers, transferring road impacts directly to the rocker panels, increasing the risk of bending or deformation. A case involving a track day vehicle showed that a car ended up having a rocker panel deformation just because the component was installed improperly. The effects are often subtle at first, manifesting as minor creaks or rattles, but they can eventually escalate into more significant structural issues, diminishing the vehicle’s overall value and potentially compromising its safety.
The responsible enthusiast recognizes that modifications are not merely cosmetic adornments; they are alterations to a carefully engineered system. Prioritizing structural integrity requires careful component selection, professional installation, and a thorough understanding of the potential consequences. A modification set that enhances visual appeal while maintaining or even improving the vehicle’s safety and rigidity represents a triumph of thoughtful design and execution. Conversely, a modification that compromises structural integrity, no matter how visually striking, is a disservice to the vehicle and a potential hazard to its occupants. The wise course of action is to always make choices that enhance the visual appearance, but only as long as the structural integrity of the vehicle is considered and preserved.
8. Resale Valuation
The story often unfolds like this: A meticulously maintained 2015 vehicle, once a source of pride, now sits on a dealer’s lot. The owner, anticipating a fair return on investment, faces an unexpected reality. The modification set, intended to enhance the car’s appeal, now acts as a deterrent to potential buyers. The vibrant color, the aggressive lines, the very features that once turned heads, now diminish the vehicle’s resale valuation. The tale serves as a cautionary reminder: the realm of aftermarket modifications and resale value is often a delicate, and sometimes unpredictable, landscape.
The connection between these modifications and the car’s subsequent market worth rests on a foundation of buyer perception and market demand. A modification set, regardless of its quality or cost, appeals primarily to a niche audience. The broader market, driven by factors like reliability, fuel efficiency, and practicality, often views such modifications with skepticism. A potential buyer might be wary of unknown installation quality, suspecting hidden damage or compromised structural integrity. The modifications, once viewed as an enhancement, become a liability, necessitating a price reduction to attract a suitable buyer. An example illustrates this point: a near-identical vehicle, unmodified and in similar condition, commanded a significantly higher resale price than its modified counterpart, despite the latter’s supposedly premium components.
Ultimately, the influence of these aftermarket sets on resale valuation is multifaceted and context-dependent. While certain subtle, professionally installed modifications might have a neutral or even slightly positive impact, the majority tend to depreciate the vehicle’s market worth. The key lies in understanding the target audience and the inherent risks associated with deviating from the factory configuration. The pursuit of personalization should be tempered with a pragmatic awareness of the potential long-term financial implications. The tale of the depreciated vehicle serves as a valuable lesson: the road to automotive modification is often paved with both aesthetic satisfaction and a potential decline in resale value.
9. Personalization Aesthetic
The desire to imprint individuality upon mass-produced objects is a recurring theme in human endeavor. The automobile, a symbol of both mobility and personal expression, becomes a canvas upon which owners project their unique visions. In the context of a 2015 vehicle, the selection and implementation of a modification set represents a deliberate act of self-definition, transforming a standardized machine into a reflection of personal taste and aspirations. The motivations are varied: a yearning for enhanced sportiness, an embrace of aggressive styling, or a simple desire to stand apart from the automotive masses. Regardless of the specific impetus, the modification set serves as a tangible manifestation of the owner’s aesthetic preferences, shaping the vehicle’s visual identity to align with a deeply held personal ideal. A notable example involved a customer purchasing a vehicle solely to dismantle it and reassemble it with a custom set of body modifications that mirrored the design of a race car from the 1990s; demonstrating a deep connection between personal nostalgia and automotive modification.
The process of selecting and installing a modification set is therefore a deeply personal undertaking, guided by subjective criteria and individual stylistic sensibilities. The choice of components, the color scheme, the overall visual themeall contribute to the creation of a unique automotive persona. The “personalization aesthetic” is not merely about external appearance; it is about projecting an image that resonates with the owner’s self-perception and values. A minimalist, subtle modification set might reflect a preference for understated elegance, while a bold, flamboyant design could signal a desire for attention and extroverted expression. Moreover, it can also reflect owner personality like someone that likes to shows off his aesthetic taste. The vehicle becomes a rolling declaration of identity, a mobile statement of individuality in a world of increasing standardization. Modification sets are not just components; they are tools for crafting a personalized narrative on wheels.
However, the pursuit of a personalized aesthetic is not without its challenges. Navigating the vast array of aftermarket options, balancing personal taste with design principles, and ensuring a cohesive and visually appealing outcome requires careful consideration and informed decision-making. The “personalization aesthetic,” while deeply subjective, must also adhere to certain objective standards of taste and craftsmanship to avoid becoming a caricature of individuality. The ultimate goal is to create a vehicle that not only reflects the owner’s personality but also commands respect and admiration for its thoughtful design and meticulous execution. Therefore, selecting body modifications is not only about visual aspect but is also about how does owner express their personality.
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Aftermarket Exterior Components for a 2015 Vehicle
Navigating the world of aftermarket exterior components can be a complex undertaking. Common inquiries often arise concerning compatibility, installation, and potential long-term effects. The subsequent discourse addresses some of these frequently voiced questions.
Question 1: Will a specific aftermarket bumper cover directly replace the factory-installed component without modification?
The notion of a truly “bolt-on” replacement is frequently more aspiration than reality. Manufacturing tolerances and design variations can lead to discrepancies. It is not uncommon for even reputable aftermarket components to require minor adjustments, such as trimming or drilling, to ensure proper alignment. Before commencing installation, a careful assessment of fitment is advisable.
Question 2: Is it feasible to install a complete aftermarket exterior set independently, without specialized tools or professional expertise?
While the allure of a do-it-yourself installation is strong, the process can quickly become complex. Modern vehicles often incorporate sensors and wiring harnesses within the bumper and side skirt assemblies. Disconnecting and reconnecting these components requires careful attention to detail and a basic understanding of automotive electrical systems. Furthermore, achieving a professional-quality finish often necessitates specialized tools and techniques, particularly when it comes to paint matching and panel alignment.
Question 3: How does the material composition of an aftermarket component influence its long-term durability and resistance to environmental factors?
The choice of material is a critical consideration. Fiberglass, while lightweight and relatively inexpensive, is prone to cracking and shattering upon impact. Polyurethane offers greater flexibility and impact resistance, making it a more durable option for daily-driven vehicles. Carbon fiber provides exceptional strength-to-weight ratio but can be susceptible to UV damage if not properly coated. The selection of material should align with the vehicle’s intended use and the prevailing environmental conditions.
Question 4: Will the addition of a rear wing or other aerodynamic components improve the vehicle’s handling and performance characteristics?
Aerodynamic enhancements are not simply cosmetic. A poorly designed or improperly installed wing can actually increase drag and reduce stability. True aerodynamic gains require careful engineering and testing, often involving wind tunnel analysis or computational fluid dynamics simulations. Unless the components are specifically designed to generate downforce and reduce drag, the performance benefits are likely to be minimal, if not detrimental.
Question 5: Does the installation of a full set of exterior aftermarket modifications invariably diminish the vehicle’s resale value?
The impact on resale value is complex. While some enthusiasts may appreciate the personalized aesthetic, the broader market often views modifications with caution. Potential buyers might be wary of unknown installation quality or suspect hidden damage. Unless the modifications are subtle, professionally installed, and aligned with popular tastes, they are likely to depreciate the vehicle’s market worth.
Question 6: Is it essential to repaint the entire vehicle after installing an aftermarket body set to ensure a seamless color match?
While a complete repaint offers the most consistent and visually appealing result, it is not always necessary. A skilled painter can often blend the new components with the existing paint, minimizing the visibility of the transition. However, factors such as sun fading, paint age, and the accuracy of the color matching process can influence the outcome. A professional assessment is recommended to determine the most appropriate course of action.
In summation, navigating the terrain of aftermarket components requires a balance of aesthetic aspirations and practical considerations. Careful research, informed decision-making, and a willingness to seek professional expertise are paramount to achieving a satisfactory outcome.
The subsequent sections will explore advanced installation techniques and maintenance strategies for aftermarket exterior components.
Navigating the Murky Waters
The path toward modifying a vehicle’s exterior is fraught with peril. Before embarking on this journey, heed these lessons learned from those who have traversed it before.
Tip 1: Temper Expectations A catalog photograph presents an idealized vision. Reality often involves imperfect fitment, requiring patience and ingenuity to overcome manufacturing discrepancies. The promise of a direct bolt-on is rarely fulfilled without some level of adaptation.
Tip 2: Embrace Due Diligence Research the manufacturer meticulously. Online forums and user reviews offer invaluable insights into the quality and consistency of their products. A seemingly lower price point can mask significant shortcomings in material quality and construction.
Tip 3: Prioritize Preparation Thoroughly clean and prepare the vehicle’s surface before commencing installation. Waxing, degreasing, and priming are essential to ensure proper adhesion and longevity of the finish. Neglecting these steps invites premature peeling and corrosion.
Tip 4: Respect the Electrical System Modern vehicles are replete with sensors and wiring harnesses. Disconnecting and reconnecting these components requires a meticulous approach. Consult the vehicle’s service manual and proceed with extreme caution to avoid damaging sensitive electronics. A short circuit can transform a cosmetic upgrade into an expensive repair.
Tip 5: Seek Expertise When Overwhelmed Recognize the limits of one’s capabilities. If the installation process becomes too complex or requires specialized tools, do not hesitate to seek professional assistance. The cost of expert intervention is often far less than the expense of rectifying a botched installation.
Tip 6: Weather the Seasons The materials used in aftermarket exterior components are often less robust than those used by original manufacturers. Protect the investment by applying sealant and wax to mitigate the impact of environmental factors. Harsh weather can accelerate degradation, diminishing the aesthetic appeal and structural integrity of the modifications.
These guidelines, distilled from the experiences of countless automotive enthusiasts, serve as a compass through the often-turbulent waters of aftermarket modification. Heed them well, and the pursuit of a personalized aesthetic may prove to be a rewarding endeavor. However, ignore them at your peril, for the path to automotive transformation is paved with both promise and potential pitfalls.
The following section presents a summary of the key considerations for maintenance and care, ensuring the longevity and continued visual appeal of these modifications.
A Final Reflection on the Pursuit of Automotive Aesthetics
The preceding exploration has illuminated the multifaceted nature of enhancing a 2015 vehicle with aftermarket components. It is clear that the integration is more than simply affixing parts. Considerations of aerodynamic influence, material durability, design harmony, installation complexity, paint matching, component fitment, structural integrity, resale valuation, and individual aesthetics coalesce to dictate the project’s success or failure. Each component has its own considerations and must follow the procedure to make sure components work properly.
The pursuit of automotive personalization is a journey fraught with both opportunity and risk. A well-executed enhancement can elevate the vehicle’s appeal and reflect the owner’s unique vision. However, a misguided modification can compromise performance, safety, and long-term value. Therefore, proceed with deliberation, prioritize quality, and respect the delicate balance between aesthetics and engineering. The road is paved with potential pitfalls, but for the discerning enthusiast, the destination of a transformed vehicle is well worth the effort. Moreover, it needs to always consider safety as main priority.
